Commercial
Real Estate News
Commercial Mortgage Originators Expect Strong, Steady Market in 2017

Commercial Mortgage Originators Expect Strong, Steady Market in 2017


According to a new Mortgage Bankers Association survey of the top commercial and multifamily mortgage origination firms, U.S. commercial and multifamily mortgage lending is expected to increase in 2017, as lenders' appetites to place new loans and borrowers' appetites to borrow both remain strong.

Nearly two-thirds (63 percent) of the top firms expect originations to increase in 2017, with one-quarter (26 percent) expecting an increase of 5 percent or more. A full half (50 percent) expect their own firm's originations to increase by 5 percent or more.

WPJ News | Jamie Woodwell, MBA's Vice President of Commercial Real Estate Research

Jamie Woodwell

"Commercial mortgage bankers expect 2017 to carry-over much of the momentum from 2016," said Jamie Woodwell, MBA's Vice President for Commercial Real Estate Research. "Most of the top firms expect strong demand from both lenders and borrowers in 2017, although not quite as strong as 2016. Originators generally see borrowing and lending volumes growing slightly, with just over half expecting potential regulatory and legislative changes to be positive for the market. The survey paints expectations of a strong, steady market in 2017."

Specific 2017 report findings include:

  • Lenders remain eager to make loans -- 96 percent of originators reported that in 2016 lenders had a "strong" or "very strong" appetite to make new loans and 77 percent expect lenders' 2017 appetite to be "strong" or "very strong".
  • Borrowers are eager to take out loans - 80 percent of originators reported that in 2016 borrowers had a "strong" or "very strong" appetite to take out new loans and 69 percent expect borrowers' 2017 appetite to be "strong" or "very strong".
  • A full 92 percent of originators reported that in 2016 their own firm had a "strong" or "very strong" appetite to make new loans. A slightly lower share (85 percent) expect their own firm's 2017 appetite to be "strong" or "very strong".
  • Most originators expect the market to grow in 2017 (and their own firms to grow more quickly). One-quarter of respondents (26 percent) expect total market originations to increase 5 percent or more in 2017. Half (50 percent) expect their own originations to increase by 5 percent or more.
  • There are mixed views on how origination volumes may change for individual capital sources. Pluralities of originators believe each major investor group, with the exception of life insurance companies, will see no change in origination volume; the plurality expect life insurance companies to increase volumes by 0-5 percent. Originations are generally expected to be flat or increase for commercial mortgage-backed securities (25 percent anticipate growth less than 5%), life insurance companies/pensions (18 percent anticipate growth less than 5%), bank portfolios (18 percent anticipate growth less than 5%), FHA (15 percent anticipate growth less than 5%) and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (10 percent anticipate growth less than 5%).
  • Loan returns are expected to increase in 2017. Half of respondents (50 percent) characterized the loans made in 2016 as "somewhat" or "very low" return. Less than one-third (30 percent) expect loans to be "somewhat" or "very low" return in 2017.
  • Loan risk is expected to increase slightly in 2017. More respondents characterized the loans made in 2016 as low risk than as high risk. In 2017, most respondents expect loans to be medium risk (53 percent), with the reminder evenly split between seeing higher and lower risk loans.
  • The majority of respondents (52 percent) expect potential regulatory and legislative changes could be positive for the market. One-in-four respondents (28 percent) anticipate a neutral impact and one-in-five (20 percent) see potential negative impacts.
  • Among the top reasons cited for positive impacts were potential changes to Dodd-Frank rules - particularly risk retention - and a more positive economic climate. Among the reasons cited for negative impacts were uncertainties that could be caused by changing rules.

Sponsored by

Comment with Facebook


Copyright 2010 - 2017 WORLD PROPERTY JOURNAL, INC. All Rights Reserved.
Advertisement
News Search
Go


Luxury Property Spotlight

Reader Poll

Advertisement
×
WORLD PROPERTY JOURNAL
 
Free News Alerts
 

Sign up now to receive the latest local & global real estate news in your inbox.

GO